Monday, May 23, 2011

new york rangers stanley cup 1994

new york rangers stanley cup 1994. New York Rangers - 1994
  • New York Rangers - 1994



  • daneoni
    Sep 19, 09:29 AM
    why does anyone need to justify to you why they want 64-bit computing?

    I was just gonna say that. All you people trying to tell people want they need and dont need are just wasting your time. At the end of the day people are gonna buy what they want regardless of what you preach to them.





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. new york rangers stanley cup
  • new york rangers stanley cup



  • cloudnine
    Aug 25, 04:51 PM
    Speaking of asinine Apple happenings... why is it that the new Mac Pro standard configuration of 2 dual-core Intel 2.66ghz processors, etc, etc is at $2499, but Apple still has the PowerMac standard configuration of 2 dual-core PowerPC 2.5ghz processors, etc, etc at $3299?

    Odd.





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. Mike Richter New York Rangers
  • Mike Richter New York Rangers



  • roadbloc
    Apr 27, 08:49 AM
    Oh well. It's not as if I get out much anyway...
    http://i.imgur.com/SFDTG.jpg





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. New York Rangers#39; Steve Larmer
  • New York Rangers#39; Steve Larmer



  • shrimpdesign
    Aug 7, 03:19 PM
    Features I want:

    -iChat screen sharing (awesome idea!) and video effects
    -Spaces (finally a Apple OS-level implementation)
    -Time Machine (I want a friggin wormhole on my computer!)

    I wish they'd show us the Top Secret features.

    But seriously, so one even saw Time Machine coming. That was a surprise!





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. new york rangers stanley cup
  • new york rangers stanley cup



  • NAG
    Mar 31, 03:39 PM
    What the heck is this? The "Steve was right" month?
    Pathetic Dell and HP, desperate Microsoft, Samsung aka Mr. "Smoothbastic", Google inhibiting fragmentation, the very one, which does NOT exist, really...
    who is next? Oh, i have got it - Adobe. So come on, resistance is futile.

    Adobe showing how the iPad is only for consumption and not worth their time. (http://www.electronista.com/articles/11/03/30/adobe.photoshop.for.ipad.to.get.layers/)





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. New York Rangers
  • New York Rangers



  • ethana
    Mar 22, 12:56 PM
    Samsung.... good move. I think you are on the right track.

    RIM. You're dead on arrival and loosing market share fast. Watch for an acquisition of these guys in the next 5 years.





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. NHL Original 6: NY Rangers
  • NHL Original 6: NY Rangers



  • carmenodie
    Mar 22, 01:12 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F190 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Please who the hell would take a step way back by going with Samsung. Yeah them tablets look cool and very thin but so damn what. Apple has the ecosystem and the customer service. Also the fit and finish of the iPad is so much more awesome then those Sammy tablets. I don't hate but come on! Samsung doesn't even control the effing software. All they can do is skin the Honeycomb OS. I'm not impressed.





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. 1994 Stanley Cup Champion)
  • 1994 Stanley Cup Champion)



  • princealfie
    Nov 29, 12:30 PM
    ... Is Ford going to start asking for a share of the groceries I haul in the trunk?

    Alas, Ford is nearly bankrupt too.





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. 1994 Stanley Cup finals
  • 1994 Stanley Cup finals



  • jeff181995
    Mar 22, 06:17 PM
    i'd totally go for one of those 10.1 galaxy tabs but i'm afraid that it might never receive an update





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. led the New York Rangers
  • led the New York Rangers



  • Reach9
    Apr 11, 03:47 PM
    No I am not kidding. You seem to be a spec whore. If those are the best phones in the market why do multiple iPhone and Blackberry devices outsell the best android phone ALWAYS?

    People keep wanting to point to these android spec whore of the month models, but they don't offer a superior experience... It is just silly.

    Like I said,t he iPhone 4 is stil the best smartphone out there.

    The thunderbolt doesn't even come close to outselling the iPhone just on Verizon.

    I seem to be a spec whore? That's a degrading word, do you rinse your dirty mouth? or I guess your vocabulary is too limited to use other words?

    But no i'm not "spec-centralized", i'm not talking about outselling. But if you want to talk about outselling.. The Thunderbolt is outselling the iPhone 4 on Verizon: http://iphone.tmcnet.com/topics/iphone/articles/160082-htc-thunderbolt-outselling-iphone-4-verizon-wireless.htm

    But i could care less what outsells. i'm talking about a user experience as a smartphone, and the iPhone does not deliver, where as Android OS does.

    "Like I said, the iPhone 4 is still the best smartphone out there" -- That is your opinion, and i frankly disagree. There are much better smartphones out there.
    Can you explain why you think the iPhone 4 is the best smartphone out there?

    Currently, the best combination looks like Android OS phone + iPod Touch.

    It sounds like you're a true fanboy!

    So a 50" SD tv is better than a 42" High Def tv?

    Wow, way to generalize. We're talking about phones. There's a huge difference between a 4" and a 3.5". Personally, Apple should have increased the screen size and then increased the resolution.





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. New York Rangers 1994 Stanley
  • New York Rangers 1994 Stanley



  • gnasher729
    Aug 17, 10:34 AM
    It doesn't matter what the tests are if you are doing it for comparison. As long as it is done the same on both machines, who cares?

    That is wrong.

    Lets say I wrote some Altivec code to make some function faster on a 400 MHz G4, because on that machine it made a noticable difference. After porting to Intel, with the slowest machine (1.66 GHz Core Solo) being at least six times faster, I didn't bother. If you measure that code, you won't find too much difference in speed. It is the code that matters that matters.





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. new york rangers stanley cup
  • new york rangers stanley cup



  • littleman23408
    Dec 1, 05:27 PM
    Sorry, Bandit, I don't have tips for the licenses. I am not that far into them yet.


    Took out the Lotus challenge in a snap. The first few times I came close to finishing it, I would have had 1st and beat it, but I either ran into the grass, or the person in first I was about to pass slowed down to much and I nailed him. But, the first time I actually completed the two laps, I was 1st. If someone needs tips I will post it.





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. new york rangers stanley cup
  • new york rangers stanley cup



  • GoodWatch
    Apr 6, 02:16 PM
    Topics like this one are just a showcase for Apple's dominating brilliance (but they don't need this) and a watering hole for Apple fanboys. Buzzwords: Apple great, competition crappy and MS :p





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. new york rangers stanley cup
  • new york rangers stanley cup



  • shamino
    Jul 20, 11:28 AM
    Not quite the first. Sun has been shipping a commercial 8-core systems for about a year now.
    Yes. This is their UltraSPARC T1 (http://www.sun.com/processors/UltraSPARC-T1/) chip.
    The T2000 has all 8 cores on one chip but each core also does four-way hyper threading so they claim 32 hardware threads.
    The T1 chip ships in several different configurations. 4-, 6- and 8-cores, at 1.0 or 1.2GHz. All sporting 4 threads per core.
    The price for an 8-core T1000 is about $8K.
    While this is their least expensive 8-core box, you should point out (for the benefit of everyone else reading this message) that the price is not just for the CPU. It's for a high-end server that includes 8G of RAM, 4 Gigabit Ethernet ports, remote management software, Java Enterprise, and Solaris 10. All in a 1U-high rack chassis.
    A system with 8 cores and 8GB RAM burns about 250W.
    You are being very misleading here. According to Sun's spec sheet (http://www.sun.com/servers/coolthreads/t1000/specifications.jsp), it has a 300W power supply. Peak power consumption for the entire system is 220W, and typical consumption is 180W.

    But those are for the entire system. Sun's page on the UltraSPARC T1 (http://www.sun.com/processors/UltraSPARC-T1/) processor itself says that the CPU (in its 32-thread configuration) consumes 72W. The rest of that power consumption is from parts other than the CPU.

    It's also worth noting Intel's Xeon spec sheet (http://www.intel.com/products/processor/xeon/specs.htm), which lists the fastest chips as consuming 130W for the CPU package alone! And that is with only four threads (two cores with 2-way hyperthreading.) I can guarantee you that a system based on one of these will have peak power consumption far greater than 220W.





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. NEW YORK RANGERS 1994 STANLEY
  • NEW YORK RANGERS 1994 STANLEY



  • Phat Elvis
    Aug 11, 11:21 AM
    G5 iPhones next Tuesday.

    Just awesome :D .





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. New York Rangers
  • New York Rangers



  • Ahheck01
    Apr 12, 05:00 PM
    BTW, apparently this site is doing live blogging:

    http://www.finalcutmtl.org/2011/04/10/supermeet-live-sur-final-cut-mtl

    That's about all I could find.

    And for you english-only forum members, here's the translated version:
    http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.finalcutmtl.org/2011/04/10/supermeet-live-sur-final-cut-mtl&ei=rsmkTfiKLsL-rAHd44WGCw&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCEQ7gEwAA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://www.finalcutmtl.org/2011/04/10/supermeet-live-sur-final-cut-mtl%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26prmd%3Divns





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. NY 1994 Stanley Cup
  • NY 1994 Stanley Cup



  • sinisterdesign
    Jul 20, 10:09 AM
    eight cores + Tiger = Octopussy?!?





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. New York Rangers 1994 Stanley
  • New York Rangers 1994 Stanley



  • rjohnstone
    Apr 25, 03:00 PM
    ya.. not like it's on right on the "features" page of iphone's website, ( http://www.apple.com/iphone/features/ .) It isn't like they have a whole page about it, ( http://www.apple.com/iphone/features/maps-compass.html .)

    Who would think the an electronic device such as an iPhone would know your exactly location? And why would any cache information locally when the same exactly information can be gotten over a slow, inconsistent connection?
    Location services is not the same as storing every place you've ever been.
    Why does the db never get cleared?

    If location info is required for an app, why would I want to use info from possibly over a year ago that may no longer be accurate?

    I won't put on a tinfoil hat just yet. For now I'll just chalk this issue up to sloppy programming. ;)

    Same on the iPhone... this is not what we're talking about here. Application tracking has always been opt in or out.

    This is just a database of cell tower pings. That's all. it's shared with NO ONE and goes nowhere except on your phone. It's like your web browser cache.
    Apple still fails to answer the question of "why?"
    Why do they need it if it is not used?

    I know why a web browser has a cache. At least the web browser is smart enough to clean that up after a while.





    new york rangers stanley cup 1994. new york rangers stanley cup.
  • new york rangers stanley cup.



  • Silverfist
    Apr 25, 03:43 PM
    [QUOTE=killr_b;12458559]As a consumer, why should I be subjected to this risk which doesn't benefit me in the slightest? And why should this data be "backed up," secretly, to my computer?[QUOTE]

    Your phone stores this so as to keep from having to re-install connection locations every time you move a few hundred feet. It's "subjecting" you to better battery life by not having to work as hard to keep you connected. Oh noes.

    ...And it backs up the data for the same reason it backs up EVERYTHING when you sync -- so you can restore without losing any of the data on the phone.

    What, you want crappy battery life, slower speeds, and loss of data if you need to restore your phone?

    .





    mwswami
    Jul 23, 04:28 PM
    Well Swami I am going to have to call your bluff. Makes no sense to skip Conroe Dual Cores on the Mac Pro yet. This Winter 2007 with Clovertowns, perhaps post MacWorld SF. But not yet. And maybe not ever.
    ...
    You fill in the specs. I can't remember what speeds are being offered. This is all just a wild guestimate for discussion purposes. Please don't flame me.

    Don't worry I won't flame you. You may turn out to be right. Only two weeks to go ...





    backdraft
    Aug 26, 04:30 PM
    Yet iBooks and PowerBooks (PPC based systems) are part of this most recent battery recall (and a prior one)... it has nothing to do with switching to Intel. Apple has been using standard commodity parts in their systems for a VERY long time now.

    ...and while you are at the site why not look at some non-Intel based systems...

    http://www.appledefects.com/wiki/index.php?title=Titanium_PowerBook_G4
    http://www.appledefects.com/wiki/index.php?title=PowerBook_12%22
    http://www.appledefects.com/wiki/index.php?title=Ibook

    From the looks of it PPC based Mac's have MUCH fewer issues.





    Eidorian
    Jul 14, 05:43 PM
    Interesting question, but I don't think any of us here will have the answers.

    PCs don't use EFI. I don't know if a generic AGP/PCIe card can be initialized by EFI, or if the card will need some EFI code to be on-board.EFI can emulate BIOS though. It's basically what Boot Camp and the original Windows hack did.

    As for OS X, I think we can be fairly certain that Apple will only bundle drivers for cards that Apple sells. If you install a third-party card, they will probably tell you that you'll need a driver from the card's manufacturer - that's what they've historically told customers.I've rarely noticed third party hardware that requires drivers. Most of them simply say "Requires OS 8.x, 9.x., 10.x". Of course newer things like 802.11g and USB 2.0 are going to need a version of OS X.



    Now, assuming that the Mac firmware (including whatever EFI drivers they include in it) is capable of initializing a generic video card, then there should be no need for more than a device driver, which the card vendors can probably provide, if they are so inclined. If the cards will require special ROM code for EFI, however, then we're back to the same problem that plagued the PPC systems.You don't need a special ROM code for the auxiliary hardware. The video BIOS doesn't change when you boot between OS X and Windows.





    wpotere
    Apr 27, 01:26 PM
    No it's not. It's basically what Mitt Romney put in place in Massachusetts. And he's a (gasp!) Republican!



    And.... Having used German healthcare which can be supplemented with private insurance, I'll take it. My needed emergency room visit lasted a whopping 45 min because people could afford to go to a doctor in the morning and everyone was covered.





    satty
    Jul 20, 08:38 AM
    Not that I wouldn't mind more processing power :D ...

    but to me it doesn't make much sense for the majority of tasks/applications.

    There might be rare exceptions in the professinal area and of course it makes lots of sense for a server, but for a single user machine?

    Whatever, bring them on... in this case I like to be proven wrong.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment